Lawyer Representing A Debtor Is Not A Consumer Under The FDCPA
In _Tinsley v. Integrity Financial Partners, Inc._, No. 10-2045 (7th Cir., Feb 11, 2011), the Seventh Circuit affirmed a grant of summary judgment in favor of a debt collector finding that a lawyer is not the consumer for the purpose of 15 U.S.C. § 1692c of the FDCPA. In _Tinsley_,…
Read More »
State Law Litigation Privilege Does Not Absolve Debt Collector From Liability Under The FDCPA
In _Ogbin v. Fein, Such, Kahn & Shepard, P.C._, No. 09-2829, (3rd Cir. Feb. 22, 2011 unpublished), the Third Circuit vacated in part and remanded a District Courts’ dismissal of a class action complaint asserting a violation of 15 U.S.C. § 1692(f)(1) of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA).…
Read More »
Claim Under West Virginia Consumer Protection Act Begins To Run The Date The Loan…
The mortgagors and a West Virginia class in _Delebreau v. Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC,_ 6:09-CV-00245 (S.D.W. Va. Jan. 18, 2011) brought an action against their mortgage loan servicer following the servicer’s commencement of a foreclosure alleging the servicer assessed illegal late fees and default fees in violation of the West…
Read More »
Mortgagor’s Remedy For Servicer’s Robo-signing Is Limited To The Remedies Available In The Foreclosure…
The U.S. District Court in Maine dismissed claims from homeowners seeking damages against a servicer for improper foreclosure. In _Bradbury v. GMAC Mortg., LLC,_ CIV. 10-458-P-H (D. Me. Feb. 16, 2011) the mortgagor filed a class action suit against the servicer after reports that the serivicer’s employees were found to…
Read More »
If A Mortgagor Is Going To Contest Standing He Or She Should Do It…
Three recent opinions have confirmed the long-standing evidentiary rule (which courts routinely ignore) that if a mortgagor wishes to contest standing he or she needs to raise that defense at the pleading stage of the case; otherwise it’s waived. In Mortgage Electronic Registration Sys., Inc. v. Barnes , 1-09-2345, (Ill.…
Read More »
A Mortgage Loan Servicer Is Prohibited By The Automatic Stay From Seeking Additional Amounts…
At the time of filing their bankruptcy action the borrowers in In re Rodriguez , No. 09-2724 (3d Cir. Dec. 23, 2010) had an escrow account arrearage with the loan servicer of $5,657.60: $3,869.91 was the amount the servicer had paid for taxes and insurance and $1,787.69 was for 2…
Read More »
Court Rejects Servicer’s Argument That Respa’s Safe Harbor Lasts Until The Borrower Files Suit;…
In Catalan v. GMAC Mortgage Corp. , No. 09-2182 (7th Cir., January 2011), the Seventh Circuit Court reversed a grant of summary judgment in favor of a servicer, finding that the District Court erred when it held that the servicer qualified for RESPA’s Safe Harbor with respect to its failure…
Read More »
The Plaintiff’s failure to explain how discrepancies in charges on a HUD-1 and TILA…
In Bonte v. U.S. Bank, N.A., No. 09-2455 (7th Cir., October 19, 2010), the plaintiff’s asserted that there were misstated charges on the TIL disclosure and the HUD-1 settlement statement, both of which were attached to the complaint. The disputed charges related to the disbursement of the loan proceeds including…
Read More »
Issuing a payoff letter and commencing foreclosure after the automatic stay was lifted did…
In Redmond v. Fifth Third Bank, No. 08-4288 (7th Cir., October 2010), the debtor filed for Chapter 13 bankruptcy protection after he defaulted on his mortgage. In 1998 there was an agreed order under which the debtor agreed to make monthly payments for a period and then a final balloon…
Read More »
Florida appellate court validates a servicer’s affidavit by rejecting mortgagor’s attempt to discredit it…
A timely decision out of Florida throws some welcome light on the affidavit controversy swirling around the default servicing world. In Freemon v. Deutsche Bank Trust Co. Americas as Trustee, No. 4D09-4275 (4th Dist. Fl. Nov. 2010), the mortgagee moved for summary judgment in a foreclosure action after the mortgagor…
Read More »