In this Chapter 13 case, In re Kemp, No. 08-18700 (Bkrtcy.D.N.J., July 17, 2008), the court concluded the debtor could reclassify his secured claim arising from a second mortgage on his residence as an unsecured claim, by stripping creditor’s lien based on residence’s value, without filing an adversary proceeding. The court in held that lien stripping did not challenge either the validity or the extent of lien. It distinguished the recent Third Circuit decision in _In re Mansaray-Ruffin_, No. 05-47 — F.3d —-, (3d. Cir. June 24, 2008) where the court held that a Chapter 13 debtor could not invalidate a lien through a Chapter 13 plan provision, but must file an adversary proceeding instead. Because the _Mansaray-Ruffin_ decision drew a distinction between challenging the validity of a lien and valuing the collateral to which that lien attached to determine the amount of the secured claim, the court concluded that the filing of an adversary proceeding was not required.
Download Related DocumentSolomon has nearly two decades of experience representing financial institutions, real estate investors and privately owned business entities. Solomon concentrates his practice in the areas of banking, consumer financial services, real estate, business law and related litigation and appellate practice.
Latest in this Category
- Illinois court says check maker is still liable to holder in due course on…
- Lender’s attempt to avoid foreclosure in Illinois backfires
- Seventh Circuit finds that “waiver of defense” clause in commercial guaranty did not waive…
- Wisconsin federal court awards fees to plaintiff for defendant’s attempt to remove case where…